![]() |
Author: Birgit Sfat Date: 28.01.2026 Reading time: 14 min |
In markets characterized by technological convergence and increasing commoditization, brand becomes the decisive differentiating factor. While product specifications can be copied and price advantages erode, the trust capital of an established brand remains a lasting competitive advantage.
The relevance of systematic brand management in the B2B context has fundamentally transformed in recent years. Three developments drive this transformation:
The distinction between B2B and B2C brand management goes beyond superficial differences like target audience size or purchase volume. It concerns fundamental assumptions about how purchasing decisions form, what role emotions play and what a brand must actually accomplish in the decision-making process.
The traditional assumption that B2B decisions are purely rational is considered outdated in modern marketing research. This notion – frequently called the "Homo Economicus myth" – ignores a fundamental reality: Behind every B2B purchase stands an individual with personal career interests, risk aversions and emotional preferences.
Gartner's research on the "New B2B Buying Journey" documents this complexity impressively: Average B2B purchasing decisions involve six to ten decision-makers with different priorities, information needs and evaluation criteria. In this context, brand fulfills a specific function: It reduces coordination costs within the buying center and provides a common frame of reference for decision-making.
B2B brand management refers to the systematic planning, design and control of brand identity in the business-to-business environment.
Its core task is reducing complexity and minimizing perceived risk for the buying center. The goal is building trust capital that manifests in shorter sales cycles, higher price realization and stable customer relationships.
Acht Länder, acht unterschiedliche Marketing-Prozesse – vor dieser Situation steht Manpower. Die Folge: Uneinigkeit darüber, welche Leads Priorität haben, sowie erschwertes Benchmarking und Austausch über Best Practices.
Um internationale Vergleichbarkeit zu schaffen und Lernprozesse im Unternehmen anzuregen, will das nordeuropäische Marketing-Team um Projektleiterin Tina Hingston ein länderübergreifend konsistentes Lead Scoring und Reporting einführen. Dafür holt sie sich Unterstützung des Strategiepartners andweekly.
Von der herausfordernden und zeitaufwendigen Rekrutierung geeigneter Fachkräfte sind Unternehmen in vielen Branchen und Regionen betroffen. Das Ziel von Manpower ist es, dem Personalmangel weltweit mit innovativen Lösungen zu begegnen. Die ManpowerGroup mit Hauptsitz in den USA und Niederlassungen in rund 80 Ländern zählt zu den weltweit führenden Unternehmen in der Personalbranche.
Kerngeschäft ist die Vermittlung von Fachkräften aus zahlreichen Branchen an Unternehmen, die sich nicht mit zeitaufwendigen Rekrutierungsprozessen beschäftigen wollen. Darüber hinaus hilft Manpower, kurzfristige Personalengpässe zu überbrücken und Produktionsspitzen mit geeigneten Human Resources auf Zeit abzufedern. Zum Unternehmen gehören zahlreiche Tochterunternehmen – darunter auch der IT-Dienstleister Experis, den wir bereits bei seiner Marketing-Strategie unterstützt haben.

Die ManpowerGroup unterhält in jedem Land ein eigenes Marketing-Team, das individuelle Ansätze im Online-Marketing verfolgt. Zwar wurde HubSpot als All-in-one-Plattform für Marketing in den meisten Landesgesellschaften etabliert, doch das HubSpot-Knowhow und der hinterlegte Lead-Management-Prozess sind sehr unterschiedlich.
Das Problem bei Manpower: Die uneinheitlichen Marketing-Prozesse der Landesgesellschaften führen zu inkonsistenter Lead-Qualifizierung: Ein Lead, der in einer Landesgesellschaft als Sales Ready eingestuft wird, kann in einer anderen als Marketing Qualified Lead (MQL) eingestuft werden.
Daraus ergeben sich für Manpower folgende Herausforderungen:
Mangelnde Vergleichbarkeit. Unterschiedliche Definitionen und Prozesse machen es schwierig, die Leistung und Effektivität von Marketing-Aktivitäten zwischen verschiedenen Landesgesellschaften zu vergleichen. Ohne einheitliche Standards können sie Best Practices nicht identifizieren und erfolgreiche Strategien kaum replizieren.
Schwierigkeiten bei Zusammenarbeit und Kommunikation. Inkonsistente Definitionen führen immer wieder zu Missverständnissen und Fehlkommunikation zwischen Marketing- und Vertriebsteams, insbesondere wenn diese länderübergreifend zusammenarbeiten.
Verpasste Verkaufschancen. Unterschiedliche und nicht immer optimale Definitionen von MQLs und SQLs bewirken, dass Mitarbeitende bestimmte Leads unter- oder überschätzen. Falsche Prioritäten in der Lead-Bearbeitung kosten wiederum wertvolle Ressourcen.
Standardisierung der Marketing-Automatisierungsprozesse für eine nahtlose Customer Journey in den verschiedenen Manpower-Landesgesellschaften
Entwicklung homogener Dashboards auf globaler Ebene zur einheitlichen Erfassung, Analyse und Vergleich der Performances von Marketing-Kampagnen
Optimierung der CRM-Strategie durch Implementierung von Best Practices für Lead-Erfassung, -Qualifizierung, -Scoring und Reporting mithilfe des HubSpot Marketing Hub
Erzielung von Effizienzgewinnen durch Reduzierung von Inkonsistenzen zwischen den Landesgesellschaften
Erhöhung der Transparenz zwischen den Landesgesellschaften hinsichtlich Lead-Generierung, Lead-Qualität und Marketing-Performance zur Verbesserung der Entscheidungsfindung und Performance
B2B brand operates on three distinct levels:
A study by IE University (2023) confirms this finding: Strong B2B brands demonstrably generate higher customer loyalty and enable premium pricing strategies because they address the fundamental uncertainty problem in complex purchasing decisions.¹
Quelch and Hartman coined the term “rationalized emotionality” in the B2B context in their Harvard Business Review analysis (2007).² Their thesis: B2B decision-makers make emotionally influenced decisions that they subsequently legitimize rationally. Brand provides both – the emotional foundation of trust for initial preference and the rational arguments for subsequent justification.
This insight has far-reaching implications for brand management: Communication focused purely on product characteristics falls short. Successful B2B brands address both the functional requirements and the personal needs of decision-makers for security, recognition and professional integrity.
The "B2B Elements of Value" framework developed by Bain & Company in 2018 represents one of the most influential conceptualizations (Bain & Company, 2018).³ The model identifies 40 discrete value elements that B2B providers can deliver and arranges them in a hierarchical pyramid.
The five levels of the value pyramid comprise:
The strategic implication of this model is clear: Functional values at the lower levels – price, specifications, delivery reliability – are necessary but not sufficient differentiators. They represent "table stakes," meaning minimum requirements for competitive participation. True differentiation occurs at the pyramid's peak, where brands create individual and inspirational value.
According to Bain's analysis, companies that excel at delivering at least six value elements achieve significantly higher Net Promoter Scores (NPS) and stronger customer loyalty than competitors with weaker value propositions.
The LinkedIn B2B Institute, in collaboration with Professor John Dawes from the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute (2023), has empirically substantiated a fundamental insight for B2B markets: At any given time, only about 5 percent of potential customers are actively in-market – 95 percent currently have no purchase need.⁴
This distribution has profound consequences for brand management:
Les Binet and Peter Field examined the optimal budget allocation between long-term brand building and short-term activation in their long-term study "The 5 Principles of Growth in B2B Marketing."⁴
Their central insight for B2B markets: The recommended split is approximately 46 percent for brand building (mental availability, trust building) and 54 percent for sales activation (short-term lead generation, conversion). This distribution deliberately deviates from the 60/40 rule common in B2C and reflects the specific mechanisms of the B2B buying process: Longer sales cycles, more complex decision-making committees and higher transaction values justify a stronger focus on activating measures – without neglecting long-term brand investment.
The study also identifies a critical imbalance in current B2B practice: The majority of companies invest disproportionately in short-term lead generation and neglect brand building (Marketing Week, 2024).⁵ The result is declining margins, extended sales cycles and increased price sensitivity – paradoxically, exactly the symptoms that could be addressed through stronger brand management.
A deeper analysis of the strategic interplay between content and brand can be found in the article on B2B content strategy.
Brand identity answers the question "Who are we?"; positioning answers "Why us?" Both concepts are interdependent but not identical.
Brand identity encompasses the brand core (purpose, vision, mission), brand values and principles, brand personality and tonality, and visual and verbal identity.
Brand positioning defines target market segments and buyer personas, the competitive frame and differentiation criteria, value proposition and benefit promise, and reasons to believe and proof points.
The process of positioning development typically follows a structured sequence: Analysis of the market environment, segmentation and identification of profitable target segments, targeting and selection of segments to address, differentiation through determination of unique value characteristics, and final condensation into a concise market position.
B2B thought leadership refers to the strategic establishment as intellectual leader in a defined subject area. Unlike product-centric communication, the focus here is on demonstrating expertise, foresight and innovative strength.
Characteristics of genuine thought leadership are:
Much content declared as thought leadership is actually disguised product advertising or superficial trend commentary. Genuine thought leadership requires investment in original insights and willingness to take uncomfortable positions.
Expectations for B2B interactions are increasingly shaped by B2C experiences. Decision-makers who privately use Amazon Prime and Netflix transfer these convenience standards to their professional procurement processes.
The dimensions of B2B customer experience encompass:
Brand manifests at each of these touchpoints. Inconsistencies between brand communication and actual customer experience erode trust faster than any competitor's negative campaign.
Content is the primary vehicle through which B2B brands communicate their identity, expertise and values. In a market environment where direct sales contacts occur late in the buying process, content takes over the task of building trust over extended periods.
The strategic content functions in brand management encompass awareness generation for the 95 percent "out-of-market" target audience, expertise demonstration as proof of competence and market understanding, trust building through repeated value contribution, anchoring the brand in the relevant set, and sales enablement with relevant materials for sales teams.
The strategic role of content extends far beyond lead generation. Content optimized primarily for gated downloads and MQL metrics often misses long-term brand effects. Successful content marketing balances short-term performance goals with sustainable brand building.
B2B brands do not emerge in campaigns but in the sum of all touchpoints over time. Channels that elude classical measurement play a central role here – as do the people who build trust as faces of the brand.
A significant portion of B2B opinion formation takes place in channels that elude digital measurement – a phenomenon known as dark social marketing.
Manifestations of dark social in B2B include private Slack and Teams channels, closed LinkedIn groups, WhatsApp and Signal conversations, industry events and conferences, informal peer recommendations, and internal discussions in the buying center.
The implication for brand management is fundamental: Last-click attribution and multi-touch models capture only a fraction of actual brand touchpoints. When a decision-maker visits the website and requests a demo after a peer recommendation in a Slack channel, the CRM shows "Direct Traffic" or "Organic Search" – the actual source remains invisible.
This insight has two consequences: First, brand management requires trust in investing in activities whose ROI does not appear in dashboards. Podcast appearances, conference sponsorships and community engagement contribute to brand capital even when no UTM parameter tracks the conversion. Second, alternative measurement methods gain importance – survey data ("How did you hear about us?"), share-of-search analyses and qualitative sales feedback.
In the B2B context, subject matter experts (SMEs) are often the most credible brand representatives. Their expertise lends substance to the brand; their personal visibility creates human connection in a business environment often perceived as impersonal.
The roles of subject matter experts in brand management include:
The strategic challenge lies in systematically orchestrating B2B influencer marketing without jeopardizing authenticity. Overcommercialized "personal brands" quickly lose credibility; completely unguided activities, on the other hand, miss synergy effects with the corporate brand.
Measurability of brand effects represents one of the greatest challenges in B2B brand management. Traditional marketing metrics like leads, MQLs and SQLs primarily capture short-term activation effects, while long-term brand effects either do not appear in these metrics or appear only with delay.
Five metrics have proven particularly meaningful for managing B2B brands. They measure different facets of brand impact – from mental availability to economic pricing power.
Complementing strategic KPIs, operational metrics provide important management information: Share of Voice shows presence in relevant channels, Engagement Rate shows resonance of brand communication, NPS and Customer Satisfaction show customer satisfaction and loyalty, Employee Advocacy shows internal brand identification, and Inbound Share shows the effect of mental availability.
A critical aspect of brand measurement is the time lag between brand investment and measurable effect. While activation measures lead to results within weeks, brand effects typically manifest in metrics only after six to twelve months.
This delay requires long-term measurement periods ("Rolling 12 Months" instead of quarterly views), separation of brand and activation budgets in ROI calculation, qualitative supplementation of quantitative metrics through sales feedback and customer surveys, and patience and management commitment to long-term investments.
Corporate identity forms the visible foundation of brand management. It encompasses all visual, verbal and behavioral manifestations of the brand and creates recognition across all touchpoints.
The elements of corporate identity include Corporate Design (logo, colors, typography, visual language, layout principles), Corporate Communication (language style, messaging, terminology, tone of voice) and Corporate Behavior (behavioral standards, customer interaction, internal culture).
In the B2B context, consistency fulfills a specific function: It signals organizational maturity, reliability and quality standards. Inconsistent brand appearances – contradictory messages between marketing and sales, divergent value promises depending on channel, or a positioning not lived internally – unconsciously raise doubts about the provider's operational professionalism.
Investment in stringent corporate identity guidelines and their consistent enforcement is therefore not an aesthetic luxury expense but an instrument of trust building.
Generative AI systems are fundamentally changing how decision-makers research information and evaluate providers. This development has direct implications for brand management.
The strategic implication: Brand management is relevant not only for human decision-makers but increasingly also for the algorithmic gatekeepers who curate information access. Why clear brand identity becomes even more important in the AI era is explored in the article on B2B brand.
B2B brand management addresses complex buying centers with multiple decision-makers, longer sales cycles and higher transaction values. The focus lies on risk minimization and trust building rather than impulse purchases. Decision-makers make "rationalized emotional" decisions – they choose based on trust and subsequently legitimize rationally.
Strong B2B brands create trust advantage that shortens sales cycles and enables price realization. They secure shortlist placements without detailed evaluation and reduce perceived decision risk in the buying center. In increasingly commoditized markets, brand is often the last defensible differentiator.
The 95-5 Rule, empirically validated by the LinkedIn B2B Institute and Professor John Dawes, states: At any given time, only about 5 percent of potential customers are actively in-market. Brand management therefore primarily targets the 95 percent "out-of-market" audience – it secures mental availability and thus future cash flow.
Central indicators are Share of Search (relative search volume compared to competitors), unaided brand awareness (spontaneous brand recall), price premium (ability to achieve premium pricing) and sales cycle velocity (shortening of sales cycles). These metrics complement operational KPIs like Share of Voice and NPS.
Corporate identity creates visual and verbal consistency across all touchpoints. In the B2B context, this consistency signals organizational maturity, reliability and quality standards. Inconsistent brand appearances unconsciously raise doubts about the provider's operational professionalism.
Thought leadership refers to establishment as intellectual leader in a defined subject area. It concerns topic leadership rather than product advertising: well-founded analyses, original research and differentiated perspectives. Genuine thought leadership requires investment in original insights and long-term topic ownership.
Research by Binet and Field recommends for B2B markets a split of approximately 46 percent for long-term brand building and 54 percent for short-term activation. This distribution reflects the specific mechanisms of the B2B buying process with longer sales cycles and more complex decision-making committees.
Brand building is a long-term investment. Measurable effects on metrics like Share of Search, brand awareness or sales cycle velocity typically manifest only after six to twelve months of continuous brand investment. Short-term campaigns can generate awareness peaks but cannot build sustainable brand strength.
Generative AI systems are changing how decision-makers research and evaluate providers. Strong brands with consistent messages, high authority and original content have higher probabilities of being mentioned in AI-generated answers. Brand becomes a selection criterion for algorithmic gatekeepers.
B2B brand management is not a marketing project but a strategic business decision with far-reaching implications for sales, product development and corporate leadership. In a world where products become interchangeable and AI systems curate information access, the trust capital of a strong brand becomes the decisive differentiating factor.
The frameworks presented in this article – from the Elements of Value pyramid to the 95-5 Rule to the Binet-Field formula – provide orientation for strategic brand management. Their implementation, however, requires more than theoretical knowledge: It demands patience, consistency and trust in investing in activities whose ROI manifests only in the medium term.
¹ IE University (2023): The Strength of a B2B Is in Its Brand. IE Insights
² Quelch, J. & Hartman, M. (2007): How to Build a B2B Brand. Harvard Business Review
³ Bain & Company (2018): The B2B Elements of Value
⁴ LinkedIn B2B Institute & Binet, L. & Field, P. (2023): The 5 Principles of Growth in B2B Marketing
⁵ Marketing Week (2024): Brand Building and the B2B Funnel